Education

Many colleges and universities still use paper-based procedures to enroll new students. Application documents must be printed, signed, scanned, and submitted via email or mail.

This leads to delays, increased administrative work, and confusing traceability. The process is often frustrating and lacks transparency for applicants.

Many universities use aptitude tests, motivation questionnaires and online assessments as part of their selection process to identify suitable applicants. However, these processes are often manual and uncoordinated and lack transparency. Forms are sent by email, responses are incomplete, and responsibilities for review and approval remain unclear.

Media disruptions, a lack of status overviews, and time-consuming enquiries can lead to delays and higher administrative costs, resulting in a poor applicant experience. Legally relevant steps, such as obtaining consent or proof of identity, are also often carried out without a clear process.

From teaching contracts to material requirements to the organization of school events, many internal processes at schools and universities are confusing, paper-based, or dependent on individuals. Even standardized feedback, such as course evaluations, feedback forms for further training, and final project evaluations, is often collected manually, resulting in low response rates and high error susceptibility.

This results in a lack of transparency, delays in approvals or applications, and a high administrative burden for both applicants and the departments processing them.

In many educational institutions, the recognition of examination results and the submission of grades are associated with a great deal of manual effort. Forms have to be printed out, signed and forwarded. Responsibilities are often unclear, which leads to long processing times and numerous queries.

A lack of transparency makes it difficult for students and teachers alike to keep track of the status of their applications.