If you are developing or using software, you may have encountered the GNU General Public License Version 3.0 (GPL v3), which was introduced in 2007 as the successor of GPL v2 and released in 1991. Like GPL v2, GPL v3 is a firm copyleft license, meaning any copy or modification of the original code must be released under the same license. This ensures that the software remains free and open source for all its users. Whenever a work including GPL v2/v3 licensed code is distributed, the primary obligations are:
In addition, GPL v3 states that anyone including the code as part of a consumer device must have any installation information necessary to update and reinstall the software. This is known as the "anti-tivoization" clause, which aims to prevent manufacturers from locking down their devices and preventing users from modifying or installing their software. Anti-tivoization is a term that refers to the practice of Tivo. This company produces digital video recorders that use GPL v2 code in their devices but add hardware restrictions that prevent users from installing modified software versions.
GPL v3 addresses this issue by requiring manufacturers to provide users with any information or tools needed to install modified software versions on their devices. It includes explicit patent licensing provisions. These provisions ensure that companies that use the GPL cannot use their patents to restrict the freedoms the license provides.
Additionally, GPL v3 addresses what happens if the license is violated and the cure of violations. While the rights under GPL v2 immediately terminate after a violation, GPL v3 provides a grace period to cure the violation.
Using GPL v3 code has some implications for both producers and users of such software:
● Safety: In some industries, like automotive, producers have to ensure that their software meets the security and safety standards and regulations of the respective industry, especially when it involves safety-critical functions or features. Using GPL v3 code may introduce safety risks because users must be enabled to deploy modified versions on their devices.
● Legal compliance: Producers must ensure that they comply with all the license requirements when they distribute their software, either as part of a device or separately. This may involve technical and administrative challenges, such as providing source code and installation information, tracking changes and modifications, etc. Failure to comply with the license may result in legal consequences, such as termination of the license, liability for damages, injunctions, etc.
● Business strategy: Producers must consider how using GPL v3 code affects their business strategy and goals. Using GPL v3 code may limit their ability to protect their intellectual property rights or monetise their software through proprietary or patent licensing. It may also affect their competitive advantage or market position, as they must share their software with their competitors and customers.
● Innovation and collaboration: producers and users can benefit from the innovation and collaboration that GPL v3 code fosters. They can access, modify and improve the software and share their contributions with the open-source community. They can also leverage the existing code base and expertise of others and avoid reinventing the wheel or duplicating efforts. This may result in better software quality, performance, and functionality.
● Freedom and control: As the software may be modified and reinstalled on devices, it can also protect rights and interests from potential threats or abuses by other users or contributors of the software, such as patent litigation, lock-in, obsolescence, etc.
● Cost and efficiency: By reducing development time and resources, as existing code can be used instead of developing new from scratch, costs can be saved, and efficiency can be increased. Also, maintenance and support costs can be reduced, as they can rely on the open-source community for bug fixes, updates, enhancements, etc. They can also avoid paying license fees or royalties for proprietary or patented software.
Contact us today to schedule a free consultation and learn more about how we can help your organization effectively navigate the complexities of open source management and compliance.
Contact us